Brian J

My feedback

  1. 334 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    60 comments  ·  Suggestions  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Brian J commented  · 
  2. 86 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    10 comments  ·  Suggestions » Visualization / Customization  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Brian J commented  · 

    Yes, it has to go (or be made optional). They should be tightening up the dead white space at the end of full view articles, not adding to it, especially with something that serves no purpose.

  3. 65 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    5 comments  ·  Suggestions » Google Reader Features  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Brian J commented  · 

    Not sure why they haven't implemented this, since it's something that Google Reader had, InoReader has, every Webmail client has--it's old news by now. I thought needing to manually refresh was a thing of the past.

  4. 85 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    12 comments  ·  Suggestions » Google Reader Features  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Brian J commented  · 

    Agreed. This seems a completely unnecessary change, particularly considering how much space is wasted when Feedly reformats posts itself with a rather large font and luxurious spacing between lines. In Google Reader (full article view), I would do a LOT less scrolling than I have to do in Feedly, and that's down to this.

    Give us the option for seeing the author's original version of the feed, please. Sometimes there's actual important formatting included in a feed, such as a table.

    Brian J supported this idea  · 
  5. 33 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    4 comments  ·  Suggestions » Visualization / Customization  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Brian J commented  · 

    Heavens, there is just so much wasted space compared to Google Reader, that it's breathtaking. This means there's a lot more scrolling, or J'g, and who wants to do that unnecessarily?

    Brian J supported this idea  · 
  6. 510 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    27 comments  ·  Suggestions  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Brian J supported this idea  · 
    Brian J commented  · 

    I'm also getting very tired of sorting each feed manually to "Oldest first" when there should be a single global option that does it. Yes, if you use the "All" view, this isn't a concern, but many of us delve into feeds individually.

  7. 743 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    38 comments  ·  Suggestions » Google Reader Features  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Brian J commented  · 

    This should not be dependent upon window width (I didn't even know that it was until today).

    I want the feed list present in all views, not just Title view.

    Brian J supported this idea  · 
  8. 298 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    28 comments  ·  Suggestions  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Brian J supported this idea  · 
    Brian J commented  · 

    If you hover over the relative time now, you do see a full published/received date and time. Unfortunately, it's in GMT and there's no time zone setting in prefs yet, so....

Feedback and Knowledge Base